PRODUCT
GROUPS

SEARCH

VIEW CART

CHECKOUT

OFF-LINE ORDER FORM

EEOC Rulings on Federal Cases: What Do They Mean to You: August 2006 Update

The EEOC is constantly refining its analysis of equal employment law, issuing dozens of decisions each month — and many are critical for practitioners to know. Before you address any EEO-related legal issue, you must thoroughly analyze each situation and consider the constantly evolving case law.

Do you know the latest EEO trends, key cases and what they mean to you?

Join Allison Uehling, Esq., for this in-depth session, part of a recurring look at significant EEOC rulings from the last several months. You'll get practical guidance on how to avoid costly mistakes that other agencies have made, such as when it's okay to order a fitness-for-duty exam and what you need to do to avoid liability for discriminatory harassment. You’ll also get guidance on how to determine if a contract employee will be considered an agency employee for the purposes of an EEO complaint.

In this 90-minute audio session, you’ll learn about significant recent cases and their impact including:

  • Glaude v. Defense Commissary Agency – deciding when an impairment is actually a disability
  • Louthen v. USPS – telephonic hearings
  • Crear v. Department of Veterans Affairs – compensatory damages for pregnancy-based harassment
  • And more

Allison Uehling presented the January and July 2005 updates, as well as the February 2006 update. Due to popular demand, Allison is back to provide an update on what’s happened in federal EEO law since then. The previous audio seminars are not prerequisites for this seminar.

(2006. CD. 90 min. Printed materials provided.)

Related Resources:
EEOC Rulings on Federal Cases — What Do They Mean to You: February 2006 Update
EEOC Rulings on Federal Cases — What Do They Mean to You: July 2005 Update
EEOC Rulings on Federal Cases — What Do They Mean to You: January 2005 Update
Price: $260.50 Shipping/Handling: $0.00 Product Code: 4900.EEO.UP3